| Weekend
Edition
July
28 / 29, 2007
Former Black Panthers in Prison
Need Your Support
Free
the San Francisco 8!
By RON
JACOBS
Eight
former Black Panthers are currently in prison in California on charges
related to the 1971 killing of a San Francisco police officer. Similar
charges were thrown out back in 1975 after it was determined that
the evidence used to indict the men was extracted by police torture.
Two of the men have been held as political prisoners the past thirty
years in New York State prisons, but the other six have been living
regular lives, working and raising families. A ninth man is still
being sought by the police.
These
men, known collectively as the San Francisco 8 (SF 8) are being
held on $3 million bail each. This bail is considered excessive
and the men, their legal team and their supporters are trying to
get it reduced so that those members of the SF 8 who are not currently
serving time can go home during the upcoming legal proceedings.
The struggle to gain these men's freedom is gaining but will require
much more public support. In a manner similar to the campaign waged
in 1971-1972 to free Angela Davis and the ongoing campaign to free
Mumia Abu Jamal, this campaign must become a widespread and international
campaign.
As
part of this growing effort, several supporters of the SF 8 spoke
on a panel at the US Social Forum in Atlanta, Georgia in June 2007.
Among the speakers were former US Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney
and former Panther Kathleen Cleaver. Ms. Cleaver's remarks were
addressed to the mostly young audience at the forum and provided
them with a historical overview of the Black Panther Party. In addition,
she talked about the US government's counterintelligence program
known as COINTELPRO and how the Panthers and other leftist popular
organizations organized despite the police harassment and attacks.
In addition, she spoke about the differences between the 1960s/1970s
and now. Most importantly, she spoke about community and the need
to understand the nature of how the State has been very successful
in criminalizing groups and people who organize against it. To fight
this phenomenon, Cleaver emphasized the need to organize and maintain
popular support beyond the radical community.
When
she introduced Ms. McKinney, she spoke to McKinney's attempts to
get Congress to investigate the COINTELPTO program.
In
order to gather some information about the current status of the
case, I recently got in touch with Claude Marks- a member of the
Freedom Archives and one of the main organizers of the Free the
SF 8 Defense Committee. Our exchange follows.
Ron:
Hi Claude. The last time I checked in with you , most of the SF
8 had just been arrested and the authorities were working on getting
the others extradited to California. Can you update the readers
to where the case is now? Are the men still in jail? What is their
bail?
Claude:
Yes, they remain in jail and the bail is currently set at $3 million
each. August 6 is when hearings on bail reduction continue - starting
with Ray Boudreaux and Richard O'Neal. Arguments based on their
responsible roles in their communities and to their families and
countering the notion that they are flight risks, will be made.
In the case of Ray Boudreaux, it is evident from the video "Legacy..."
that he was fully aware of being targeted and yet, voluntarily made
all of his appearances before the 2005 grand jury. Their intent
is to fight the unjust charges and win!
The
hope is that bail will be reduced and will be set at amounts obtainable
through securing property (by California law at twice the value
of the bail amount) allowing their defense to continue with them
in the streets and with their families.
Ron:I
know this is conjecture, but why do you think the state has set
the bail so high? What are they afraid of?
Claude:I
think the bail is set high as part of the state's criminalization
of them - the same reason they are brought into the public courtroom
in chains and shackles.
Ron:
How has the response of the public been--in San Francisco? How about
the rest of the country? The world?
Claude:
Support is growing tremendously - as people find out about the case
they are outraged that such enormous resources are being expended
to prosecute these elder of the black community. National and now
international showings of "Legacy..." along with our efforts
to speak widely about the case are responsible for a much broader
movement being built.
Ron:
Most observers agree that this case is (as the SF 8 said in their
May 19, 2007 statement) "a continuation of COINTELPRO."
Can you explain how and why this is so?
Claude:
The prosecution is designed to re-criminalize resistance to a repressive
and racist state. The conditions that led to demands for self-determination
and an end to police & government violence against the black
community, that led to the ten-point platform of the Black Panther
Party and the creation of community programs, still exist. The fact
that more black people are in prison than in higher education, that
poverty levels are unrivaled, that the future for black and brown
children is so bleak makes the politics of these men and the movements
they helped lead even more urgent today. The state wants to warn
people that resistance to colonialism and empire is futile or comes
at a very high price.
COINTELPRO's
goals and practice are not only much the same under Homeland Security
and The Patriot Act - but are unencumbered by a political climate
that took outrage at violations of civil and human rights in the
1970s when a Congressional investigation declared illegal the FBI
led program. Today, the government, state and federal, act with
impunity as long as they use the 'T' word. The evidence in this
case - still based on the torture and brutality of police interrogators
against some of these men - is now being put forth as acceptable
- torture having been re-defined and also justified in the Guantanamos
and Abu Ghraibs and Atticas...and the jails of New Orleans.Ron:
Also, what do you all make of the recent release of the CIA documents
(the so-called Family jewels)? I read a writer somewhere making
the point that the release was timed to turn our attention away
from the current doings of the government and its secret police.
What's your take on that?
Claude:
The current regime is worse, and feeling emboldened by numbed public
opinion. It is up to us to marshal the community outrage and build
a movement that rejects the sense of government impunity - a movement
that forces the dropping of these charges and a release of these
8 men - including the long overdue release of Jalil Muntaqim and
Herman Bell who are parole eligible and have lived more than half
their lives in prison behind COINTELPRO prosecutions.
Ron:
In recent months, several environmental activists have been jailed
for their supposed involvement in arson and other such actions against
various corporate and research facilities. Without getting into
the logic behind these actions and their effect, do you believe
the government's pursuit and prosecution of these activists is related
at all to the government's insistence on prosecuting the SF 8?
Claude:
The so-called justice department wants to smash any and all dissent
and has for years targeted the environmental and animal rights movements
to make their resistance costly. The sentencing of Jeff 'Free' Luers
to almost 28 years for property crimes by an Oregon Judge who stated
that Free was being made an example to discourage the building of
a movement was the opening parry of the 'Green Scare.' Yes, this
is part of creating a chilling effect on dissent and a repressive
atmosphere that selectively labels people terrorists to suit the
goals of an extreme right-wing agenda.
Ron:
These folks have received some pretty stiff penalties because the
prosecution has been able to portray them as "terrorists."
What do you think this means in the long term for the SF 8 and for
political activism of any sort?
Claude:
The SF 8 will prevail because the legal case is weak and the political
movement will expose the torture-induced statements and build sizeable
community-based outrage at these prosecutions.
Ron:
Back to the SF 8. When is the next bail reduction hearing? After
that, what's next?
Claude:
Bail hearings resume August 6. Other motions will address matters
like the 30+ year delay when there is no new evidence, lost evidence,
as well as the unnecessary chaining and shackling of these men in
court.
Ron:
How can the readers support the defense? Are there buttons and bumperstickers?
What about speaking engagements? And personal support for the brothers
in jail?
Claude:
For a list of what you can do to stay informed and contribute to
building a support movement in your community check out this site
Ron
Jacobs is author of The Way the Wind Blew: a history
of the Weather Underground, which is just republished by Verso.
Jacobs' essay on Big Bill Broonzy is featured in CounterPunch's
collection on music, art and sex, Serpents in the Garden.
His first novel, Short Order Frame Up, is published by Mainstay
Press. He can be reached at: rjacobs3625@charter.net
|